I just has some one look at the M1000bx/u/lu lamp it has an 80mm arc tube. I caledEYE and she said it is indeed 80mm. the web listing is wrong! so the venture 875 watt lamp is still a beter lamp.
The Pro lens is here and that means for most people they will have a extera 330mm fresnel. I say why not use it with a new light setup.
This the same thing as the 1000 watt post just with different parts. I found a better lamp to use that has a 42mm arc length what this means is that with a 330mm rear fresnel all the arc will now fit in the pro lens with no waste. Hear is the link to the specs.[EDIT the lamp has an 80mm arc}
http://www.eyelighting.com/tb/MH/multimeta...52-78-51605.pdf
and a source for the lamp.[edit wrong arc]
http://www.businesslights.com/product_info...5b8c189f07e72ab
The ballast is a venture from the same place.
http://www.businesslights.com/product_info...5b8c189f07e72ab
My oringnal Idea was to run a 1000 watt lamp and a 330mm rear fresnel a long time ago that is why I have a 550mm fresnel and a 330mm fresnel from 3dlenes but I still think I can get more light from a elliptical system. but if you want to try a high LUX system with a 330mm fresnel someone might give these lamps a try.
If you use a 330mm/650mm fresnel then what is the largest arc that will work for the pro lens and fit in the triplet?
Most peole will have around a 575mm front fl so the back can be a little long So let's cal the back 340mm
340/575=.591 .591 X 1000mm= 59mm arc not too far from 80mm so maybe a 1k might not be too bad
Venture does have this 875 watt one with a 71mm arc
http://www.venturelighting.com/LampsDataSh...alide/33759.pdf
And they list this 750 watt one too with an 50mm arc I would call and make sure the arc is realy 50mm
http://www.venturelighting.com/LampsDataSh...teLux/33940.pdf
any takers?
