QUOTE (supermadmax @ May 6 2004, 07:05 PM)
Jones I built one and it works. If you build one you will understand.
I'm sure what you built works, what I'm saying is that calling it "antigravity" is a stretch. Antigravity is the ability to allow a mass to reject another mass (like two opposing magnets rejects each other). This triangle project is not it, the mass of the earth still pull the mass of this triangle, there is no "antigravity" here. The electrons are positioned in a way which gives the triangle a net movement, but this net movement is artificial and can be positioned into any direction ones wish (i.e also down to earth), an antigravity force should naturaly only be able to let an object get away from earth, but never get closer to it. also, it will work better in space than on earth, so calling it "antigravity" is simply B.S.
What really seemed like an antigravity effect to me, was the Hutchison Effect, but since he was unable to recreate this effect with real scientists using a controlled environment, it seems bogus too.
The Searl-Effect is another bogus, unsubstantiated claim. The only one claiming this thing ever flew is its inventor, which by a miracles way say all of the original schematic to make such a device was lost, due to the public low interest when it was first shown in the 60's. Now he's trying to make people believe he can build it again, with the team he assembled. Yeah, right.
All in all, in the entire AmericanAntigravity site there is not even one substantiated claim which shows antigravity exists. It just seems like another foolish "Cost to Cost AM" show, hosted by the notorious Art Bell.