r3n0
Nov 9 2005, 04:36 PM
looking great!
comp_atkins
Nov 10 2005, 10:59 PM
shivers20
Nov 11 2005, 04:04 AM
Man that box is a beast. It looked big before now it looks like you can use it to shelter a family of four from a rain storm. Looks good my friend.
Is that oil of olay I see?
FokNut
Nov 11 2005, 05:40 AM
QUOTE (shivers20 @ Nov 10 2005, 11:04 PM)

Is that oil of olay I see?

Keeps the skin soft and beatiful

I use that also since the cold really dries my skin, and I'm in FL!!
Nice setup there...
Unfortunately my project is on hold since my wife consfiscated my LCD for her little Mac Mini. I just don't get Mac's.
comp_atkins
Nov 11 2005, 07:07 PM
QUOTE (shivers20 @ Nov 10 2005, 11:04 PM)

Man that box is a beast. It looked big before now it looks like you can use it to shelter a family of four from a rain storm. Looks good my friend.
Is that oil of olay I see?

haha good eye u got there.. takes a lot of work for me to look my best
shivers20
Nov 12 2005, 04:43 AM
Hey Comp, I just noticed you have the same curtains as I do. My woman made me take them down. Something about looking like a meth lab or was it a crack house. Oh well!
comp_atkins
Nov 13 2005, 02:36 AM
QUOTE (shivers20 @ Nov 11 2005, 11:43 PM)

Hey Comp, I just noticed you have the same curtains as I do. My woman made me take them down. Something about looking like a meth lab or was it a crack house. Oh well!

shh! the meth lab is my side business... but don't tell anyone!
comp_atkins
Nov 15 2005, 01:17 AM
time for a few updates.... my 2 92mm vantec stealth fans arrived a few days ago, got em installed


then spent the next 5 hours doing temperature measurements and watching LOTR return of the king.


dark scenes look pretty good

measured temps every 30 minutes or so using a digital meat thermometer..placed thermometer in air slot at center of screen. unfortunatly it is not long enough to reach the midpoint on the display, so temps are probably higher lower down the panel.. but the measurements i got look pretty good:
T = 0, Lamp on (degrees F): 68.9
T+5 min: 71.6
T+35 min: 78.6
T+65 min: 79.7
T+95 min: 81.6
T+125 min: 84.0
T+155 min: 82.0
T+185 min: 87.4
T+215 min: 87.2
T+245 min: 84.5
T+305 min: 83.3
so over a 5 hour period ( really the longest i imagine i'd be running this thing straight anyway ) my temps never exceeded 90 degrees F. i'm sure my temps are hotter towards the bottom of the screen but i think its safe to say my cooling setup is adequate

...and those stealths are nice and quiet
samuraijack
Nov 15 2005, 01:52 AM
QUOTE (comp_atkins @ Nov 13 2005, 02:36 AM)

shh! the meth lab is my side business... but don't tell anyone!
Yeah, I keep waiting for someone to have a police run in, because the Metal Halides put out a "just so" thermal and radiation signature that looks like theres a greenhouse going in a house....
My friend in the NG said they could do a thermal/radiation scan of my garage during the next manuvers...
Cant wait!
Why would they even have the equipment?
Well. Marijuana is Vermonts largest cash crop. The Feds estimate that over 15 tons of it get grown every year. And thats just the open fields. The national gaurd has a harvest program which they use each year to harvest between 3-6 tons each year. They use the radiative resonance of the plant as a source. Shows up like glowy green wool...Less than half of that is officially disposed of in the state each fall. They also do regular sweeps for non standard UV sources and abnormal heat blooms...
Just a tidbit...
Dweezilkid
Nov 15 2005, 02:26 AM
Waaa!!! You beat me to it!
Seriously, though, great numbers! I've got three fans (two evercools and one 60mm Stealth) and I'm running at a steady 89/90 degrees. Looks like I'll be ordering my own 92mm Stealths now!
How noticable is fan noise during quiet dialogue scenes? Can you hear things in movies like wind and leaves rattling again?
comp_atkins
Nov 15 2005, 02:50 AM
QUOTE (samuraijack @ Nov 14 2005, 08:52 PM)

Yeah, I keep waiting for someone to have a police run in, because the Metal Halides put out a "just so" thermal and radiation signature that looks like theres a greenhouse going in a house....
My friend in the NG said they could do a thermal/radiation scan of my garage during the next manuvers...
Cant wait!
Why would they even have the equipment?
Well. Marijuana is Vermonts largest cash crop. The Feds estimate that over 15 tons of it get grown every year. And thats just the open fields. The national gaurd has a harvest program which they use each year to harvest between 3-6 tons each year. They use the radiative resonance of the plant as a source. Shows up like glowy green wool...Less than half of that is officially disposed of in the state each fall. They also do regular sweeps for non standard UV sources and abnormal heat blooms...
Just a tidbit...

yikes! maybe i'll shield my entire room in lexan to block the stray UV
QUOTE (Dweezilkid @ Nov 14 2005, 09:26 PM)

Waaa!!! You beat me to it!
Seriously, though, great numbers! I've got three fans (two evercools and one 60mm Stealth) and I'm running at a steady 89/90 degrees. Looks like I'll be ordering my own 92mm Stealths now!
How noticable is fan noise during quiet dialogue scenes? Can you hear things in movies like wind and leaves rattling again?
well, the fans are not totally silent of course.. but the 2 in the box now are noticably more quiet that the single 92mm panaflo i borrowed out of my pc that i used to have in there.. the fan noise does not interfere much at all with movie watching now, though during very quiet scenes i can still hear them.. maybe i just need to beef up my sound system
comp_atkins
Nov 19 2005, 06:37 PM
today's the day... i'm making the leap into anti-glare freedom... wish me luck!
jonjandran
Nov 19 2005, 07:53 PM
GOOD LUCK !!!
r3n0
Nov 20 2005, 02:01 AM
good luck man! let me know how it does, i might end up doing it also
comp_atkins
Nov 20 2005, 07:03 AM
update: ok i'm attempting to de-anti-glare my LCD using the water soak method.. its been soaking for almost 11 hours now and i think the ag is finally starting to loosen a bit... though as i peel it is rather brittle and end up breaking into tiny pieces.... perhaps i need to let it soak longer.. i think i'll leave it the rest of the night and try again in the morning..
phero
Nov 20 2005, 09:20 AM
I was thinking of doing the rag method too in a few days. Got my fingers, and toes, crossed for you!
Did you tape the edges when pulling it up?
comp_atkins
Nov 20 2005, 05:25 PM
*&#*! :angry:
so i get up this morning ready to see is the ag is easier to peel off.. and what do i see? the paper towel was totally dried out... so my guess its back to square one with this process. we'll see what happens...
comp_atkins
Nov 21 2005, 04:44 PM
wow.. what a nightmare... finshed getting the anti-glare of my panel
very early this morning ( or
very late last night depending on how you want to look at it ) basically i had the thing under pretty heavy soak for about 16 hours ( after my initial 12+ soak dried up entirely while i was sleeping

) and still had some stuggle taking the ag film off.... it would peel very easily at times but other times it would tear and i ended up having to peel it off in pieces and go very slowly.. if anyone else is planning on the water soak method for an l72s, bring a LOT of patience because the ag does not give up without a heck of a fight.
good news is after a long hard struggle i managed to get about 98% of it off and what is left around the edges ( the most stubborn areas ) isn't part of the pixel surface.. my plan is to allow to dry all day today just to be on the safe side, reinstall tonight, pray to god and flip the switch.
we'll see what happens...
ps. pics to follow once i get them downloaded.
r3n0
Nov 21 2005, 04:51 PM
wow i hope it works!
comp_atkins
Nov 21 2005, 06:36 PM
yeah me too... i
REALLY hope i didn't mess up my panel.
comp_atkins
Nov 21 2005, 09:56 PM
was just thinking.. i wonder who'll be first to post a xbox360 screenshot
comp_atkins
Nov 22 2005, 06:10 PM
whew.. it was a stuggle but i managed to get my ag off without destroying my panel

here's my frensel / LCD assembly removed from my pj

closeup of the enemy..

LCD removed and electronics masked.

paper towels laid down and soaked

just to recap, i only had 1 layer of paper towel laid down and it ended up drying out while i was asleep, after 12+ hours of soaking too. so the next day i had to reapply and start the clock all over again.
comp_atkins
Nov 22 2005, 06:19 PM
after the resoak, i was finally able to start getting the ag off.

the soak could have gone better but after being VERY careful peeling the film off and going very slowing ( it did not come off "like butter" like others' ) the panel is just about ag free.

only had a small amount of residue left over while was easy to get off with a little alcohol. i was not able to get all of the ag off in one piece which it partly why it took forever to remove. here's one of the larger pieces held up to a light.

most of the large chunks removed.

around 5 am i finally got the last bits removed so i was a little punchy...
giving the ag what it deserves!
Dweezilkid
Nov 22 2005, 06:41 PM
But what about the LCD? Is it still alive?!
Congrats on your patience through this!
Zete
Nov 22 2005, 07:10 PM
QUOTE (comp_atkins @ Nov 22 2005, 01:10 PM)

whew.. it was a stuggle but i managed to get my ag off without destroying my panel

Yes, Dweezilkid, it's still alive.
Everybody has to be a smart alec every now and then.
comp_atkins
Nov 22 2005, 07:19 PM
here's the last little bit of ag that i could not get off, it really is not an issue for me since its out of the field of view.

not-so-new but definatly improved panel back in its home.

i was quite concerned about the panel still working afterwards because on of the corners was slightly damaged while trying to get the ag clear of the polarizer.
i put the box back together, crossed my fingers, and flipped the switch. the first thing i noticed with the top off was the light hitting the triplet was much crisper that it was before.. i put the top back on, threw in the episode 3 dvd and this is what i got..

yoda is such a little badass



i'm very pleased with the result of the ag removal though i didn't see the increase in brightness ppl talk about. the picture is definately shaper when focused and the colors are improved.
comp_atkins
Nov 22 2005, 07:22 PM
QUOTE (Dweezilkid @ Nov 22 2005, 01:41 PM)

But what about the LCD? Is it still alive?!
Congrats on your patience through this!
dweez,
yup, it made it though its ordeal relatively unscathed..

i ended up with a tiny tear in the polar in the lower corner as a result of trying to pry the ag up.. when fullscreen is displayed, there is a tiny sliver of white that always shows up now where the polar was damaged... not a big issue though since its at the very edge..
EDIT: forgot to mention, i'm also able to see the fresnel grooves on the screen now.. i know many others had them show up as well, i'll re-adjust my distances and hopefully that'll clean it up.. is there any way to tell if they are the read fresnel or front fresnel gooves?
Dweezilkid
Nov 22 2005, 07:27 PM
Sweet!
Glad to hear the operation was a success. The shots look great! I've still got a little residue on an edge too -- doesn't show up in widescreen movies either.
I'll revise my earlier statements about brightness -- I think my "perceived" brightness is higher since the contrast, colors, and sharpness are all so much better. Though I think it helped a little.
mikyd1954
Nov 22 2005, 07:31 PM
QUOTE (comp_atkins @ Nov 22 2005, 01:22 PM)

dweez,
yup, it made it though its ordeal relatively unscathed..

i ended up with a tiny tear in the polar in the lower corner as a result of trying to pry the ag up.. when fullscreen is displayed, there is a tiny sliver of white that always shows up now where the polar was damaged... not a big issue though since its at the very edge..
congrats on the ag, just finished mine too , its an older hyundai panel I believe(17") do you know the lcd panel model number itself?(as opposed to the LCD model(which I see is the 72s) it usually on the backlight or thereabouts, mine looks fairly similar, though an older model.... ag stripped fine on mine except a couple of edges...
comp_atkins
Nov 22 2005, 09:06 PM
QUOTE (mikyd1954 @ Nov 22 2005, 02:31 PM)

congrats on the ag, just finished mine too , its an older hyundai panel I believe(17") do you know the lcd panel model number itself?(as opposed to the LCD model(which I see is the 72s) it usually on the backlight or thereabouts, mine looks fairly similar, though an older model.... ag stripped fine on mine except a couple of edges...
hmm... dunno if i still have those parts laying around.. i'll have to check on that.
comp_atkins
Nov 23 2005, 10:46 PM
time for a few before / after screenshots of my anti-glare removal.
top screen is ag removed. bottom is ag in place.




just starting to get introduced to the magic of ffdshow.. this program is awesome!
screenshot comparison with ag removed, top is ffdshow enabled, bottom is disabled.
*disclaimer: my machine is not powerful enough (yet) to run this quality at full framerate, the pic is for comparison only*
mikelish
Nov 24 2005, 06:57 AM
Odd... i prefer most of the lower photos (not counting the ffdshow).
brutuz
Nov 24 2005, 09:01 AM
QUOTE (comp_atkins @ Nov 22 2005, 06:37 AM)

small piece of polar was damaged in corner while trying to pry ag away from it, not a big deal as most use is widescreen media.
What does the damage look like when projected?

thats a real shame you can only use widescreen media.
scubasteve2365
Nov 24 2005, 09:14 AM
QUOTE (mikelish @ Nov 24 2005, 06:57 AM)

Odd... i prefer most of the lower photos (not counting the ffdshow).
Maybe he got them backwards, as the way the images look, the lower ones also look better to me.
ozstang65
Nov 24 2005, 12:34 PM
QUOTE (comp_atkins @ Nov 23 2005, 05:22 AM)

...EDIT: forgot to mention, i'm also able to see the fresnel grooves on the screen now.. i know many others had them show up as well, i'll re-adjust my distances and hopefully that'll clean it up.. is there any way to tell if they are the read fresnel or front fresnel gooves?
I'd say they'll be the rear. My collimating fres is now ~35mm from the LCD and I have no evidence of fres rings whatsoever.
shivers20
Nov 24 2005, 05:35 PM
The images arent switched around. I think many of us are looking for brighter images. If you look carefully at each image you can tell the difference, color is more vivid, much crispier, and shadow detail has improved a great deal. A good example is the third photo, the image with some sort of spike and finger in darkness, not really sure what movie thats from but anyway look at the color of the finger, its very true to color. Also look at the light hitting the rock? thats what I call some natural light. The before photo looks blue. I think a/g removal gives us better colors and better detail as previously stated. Most of us are always looking for that boost in brightness so thats the first thing we look for.
comp_atkins
Nov 24 2005, 05:53 PM
QUOTE (brutuz @ Nov 24 2005, 04:01 AM)

What does the damage look like when projected?

thats a real shame you can only use widescreen media.
brutuz,
the damage basically looks like a small sliver of white when projected... even if the image is blue or red or black or whatever, it always shows up as white... i'll get a pic up of it soon, its not that bad really.. 4:3 content is still very watchable but its not 100% perfect anymore... only about 98.5%
comp_atkins
Nov 24 2005, 05:57 PM
QUOTE (scubasteve2365 @ Nov 24 2005, 04:14 AM)

Maybe he got them backwards, as the way the images look, the lower ones also look better to me.
the images are correct. the top ones are with the ag removed... you can tell the lower images look a little washed out relative to the upper images also in some of the pics, more detail is seen in the upper pic, for example the smegol pic u can see more detail in the hair clothes in the upper pic vs. the lower. as far as brightness goes i dont think the images are really any brighter, just better colors and contrast.
mikelish
Nov 24 2005, 11:36 PM
You're right, i couldnt see it until i used a CRT. Man the LCD in my projecter might be better then the LCD i use on my computer!
comp_atkins
Nov 25 2005, 01:02 AM
QUOTE (mikelish @ Nov 24 2005, 06:36 PM)

You're right, i couldnt see it until i used a CRT. Man the LCD in my projecter might be better then the LCD i use on my computer!
thats the way it should be
SonicWonder2000
Nov 25 2005, 07:21 PM
Awesome comparison shots! I hope to be getting some like these up on my PLOG soon.
The post a/g removal shots most certainly have better color saturation/contrast, but it is not as dramatic as in some of the shots I have seen. It could certainly have to do with the inaccuracies of screenshots in general, I am finding that myself. It is very hard to capture color differentials in screenshots. In person, my picture looks far better post a/g-strip than my screenshots suggest.
My other question is did you change your video driver settings? It does seem like you have your post a/g-strip contrast (white level) set a bit lower. I can see no other reason why the apparent brightness of the projection should DECREASE after a/g strip ?
comp_atkins
Nov 25 2005, 07:53 PM
QUOTE (SonicWonder2000 @ Nov 25 2005, 02:21 PM)

Awesome comparison shots! I hope to be getting some like these up on my PLOG soon.
The post a/g removal shots most certainly have better color saturation/contrast, but it is not as dramatic as in some of the shots I have seen. It could certainly have to do with the inaccuracies of screenshots in general, I am finding that myself. It is very hard to capture color differentials in screenshots. In person, my picture looks far better post a/g-strip than my screenshots suggest.
My other question is did you change your video driver settings? It does seem like you have your post a/g-strip contrast (white level) set a bit lower. I can see no other reason why the apparent brightness of the projection should DECREASE after a/g strip ?
in thinking about that the other day i relaized i may not have even had the same camera shutter settings for the before and after pics ( i know... REAL scientific huh? ) plus i found some picture settings i could play with in my dvd software that i was messing around with.... so much for an apples to apples comparison.
comp_atkins
Nov 28 2005, 03:38 AM
my new issue: did some lens re-aligning other day but light is still hitting triplet off-center and not allowing for me to get complete focus across the entire screen. ( its maybe 95% there, but i'm picky ) i think i'm going to have to build in some horitontal adjustment for the triplet itself.. -sigh- time to break out the rotary tool again...
Litherish
Nov 30 2005, 01:53 AM
Very nice projector, you mention that the light was hitting the triplet off center, I noticed a few pages ago in your plog when you used the Laser and the laser hit slightly to the left of the triplet. And I dont remember if you had said you resolved that, and now your getting to that.
Good luck on getting the horizontal adjustment bracket for your triplet.
FLY CRJ
Nov 30 2005, 02:52 AM
The ag removed shots are BIG improvement in contrast! WoW! Can't wait to remove that AG on my WUXGA.
comp_atkins
Nov 30 2005, 03:14 AM
QUOTE (FLY CRJ @ Nov 29 2005, 09:52 PM)

The ag removed shots are BIG improvement in contrast! WoW! Can't wait to remove that AG on my WUXGA.
thx, fly

cant wait to see the wuxga in action! just read up on everyone else's experiances before going at the antiglare to be safe!
FLY CRJ
Nov 30 2005, 03:22 AM
Yea, haha hehehe, waiting for someone to take the leap first hopefully. Maybee it will be me hell I duuno. The whole process seems very safe as long as the Ag layer is permeable.
comp_atkins
Nov 30 2005, 04:35 PM
someones got to be the pioneer right? why not you?
mikyd1954
Nov 30 2005, 04:40 PM
QUOTE (comp_atkins @ Nov 27 2005, 09:38 PM)

my new issue: did some lens re-aligning other day but light is still hitting triplet off-center and not allowing for me to get complete focus across the entire screen. ( its maybe 95% there, but i'm picky ) i think i'm going to have to build in some horitontal adjustment for the triplet itself.. -sigh- time to break out the rotary tool again...
damn...that never occurred to me....jeez , I've recut my frontpiece 3 times now.... thanx for the idea... I can put h/v alignment in it just like for the bulb..sigh... I can't believe that never occurred to me
comp_atkins
Nov 30 2005, 05:58 PM
QUOTE (mikyd1954 @ Nov 30 2005, 11:40 AM)

damn...that never occurred to me....jeez , I've recut my frontpiece 3 times now.... thanx for the idea... I can put h/v alignment in it just like for the bulb..sigh... I can't believe that never occurred to me

"Adjustability. Adjustability. Adjustability. These three hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be, what you can be, what you will be."
managed to widen the triplet hole a bit horizontally but it still looks like a chunk of the arc is hitting the edge.. may have to widen it a little bit more to slide triplet over
Click to view attachmentstill not 100% satisfied with my focusing "mechanism" either.. one of these days i may pull the whole front of the box off and start over...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.