Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: OMG - the worst has happened.
Lumenlab > LLAVS: Lumenlab AVS > Projector Builder > Projector Technical Support
SonicWonder2000
Oh God ! sad.gif sad.gif sad.gif sad.gif sad.gif sad.gif

Help!

My projector was completed today, and suddenly, my LCD is dead (benq 567v2).

Earier today, it showed "no signal" and then the panel light would turn from green to yellow.

Now, the panel light doesn't even come on. No blue, no yellow, no nothing. The LCD is also dead; It shows absolutely no change when trying to power it on.

I had a perfect projection last night before I screwed down the power supply board and controller board. I have reseated the FFC's several times, and reinserted the controller board into the power supply board several times. The power supply MOSFETs seem to get VERY hot. I am still getting voltage at some of the pins (3V) but nothing on the controller board.

I have yet to common all the boards (I have a benq 567) but everything worked perfect last night without grounds; why should that change all of a sudden?

If my LCD is dead, this is the end of the project for me and I will be selling everything I have.

The projection was, for what it is worth, eqxuisite for the short time it was alive.
jaggg
That is a bummer Sonic sorry to hear that.I thought my lcd was dead several times but it was always something silly like the ffc cable was not in all the way.
wawul
I am so sorry my brother, I can only imagine how it feels, especially with such a good and expensive panel... I still haven't stripped my LCD but I fear the day... Don't give up yet, if you're positive it's dead, I'd suggest buying an LCD with a broken backlight on ebay, at least temporarily, until you can get something better. There are always 'dim' panels with broken backlights at low prices, just keep checking and maybe in a week or two you'll find something you like. This is what I've noticed:

lcd #1
lcd #2

Good luck, maybe if you poke here and there it will start working again. I'll sacrifice some animals to the projector gods. And don't give up!

-wawul
Hyper Smiley
Sounds like you're still getting standby and the power supply is probably good. Take things step by step in diagnosing the problem. I wouldn't assume the worst, it's often the simplest of things that catch us off guard. wink.gif Try toubleshooting with just the PSU, LCD controller, and control panel to see if you can get it to power up on it's own.
Cold Steel
change your video cable first.
SonicWonder2000
QUOTE (Cold Steel @ Jun 24 2005, 06:58 AM)
change your video cable first.
*


Tried that sad.gif . Used two different cables, one I know works (used on another computer).
dukemd4
QUOTE (SonicWonder2000 @ Jun 24 2005, 02:48 PM)
QUOTE (Cold Steel @ Jun 24 2005, 06:58 AM)
change your video cable first.
*


Tried that sad.gif . Used two different cables, one I know works (used on another computer).
*




the same thing happened with my benq 567s. worked fine then didnt get anything on the power button (yellow or blue light). found out one of the small wires going into the control panel wasnt connected. reconnected it yesterday and the lcd powered up fine. might want to check all those connections. dry.gif

good luck!!!
SonicWonder2000
SHE LIVES!! Thanks to all those who gave suggestions! biggrin.gif

And I have crappy BenQ engineering to thank for all this! Here's what made the LCD come to life:

Click to view attachment

GROUNDING!! huh.gif blink.gif huh.gif blink.gif ohmy.gif blink.gif ph34r.gif rolleyes.gif :angry: cool.gif

I will say this and then say it again (in the help forum smile.gif ) - This is the crappiest example of engineering I have seen to date. The darn thing worked flawlessly without the grounds and then decided to not turn on altogether. Even if the unit appears to work without these connection, I would attach them as a matter of course with this LCD.

I know there are those that swear by their BenQ's, but If I were to do it again, I would use a Samsung 512. The last 36 hours has been pure HELL, wondering if the project was toast; I would not wish it upon my worst enemy.

That being said, movie night at my house, and you're all invited! biggrin.gif
Mikau
Wonderfull! Really glad to hear it. It made me sad to hear you were quiting when it wouldn't work. So happy to hear you got it working.
pagercam
I think its a bit inappropriate to call a device bad engineering when an untrained technician dismantles a product and it doesn't work in another configuration. Benq knows that thier monitors will be used as monitors with all the sheilding in place and has no expectation that it will be used in any other way. The sheilding provies the continuous ground and that is one way to do the engineering, and as an engineer I have no problem with that way to provide ground. As many of the people at LL don't have an engineering or electrical backround I'll explain a few things that may help people understand the issues involved.

There are two parts to DC power, the power line and the ground, it is the most important thing, especially in digital electronics, that there is one and only one ground so that all circuits (chips or boards) have their signals referenced to the same ground potential. There is a joke, engineering jokes aren't funny to non-engineers, that says that digital engineers have only heard rumours of something between zero and one, i.e. volatges are either high or low (0 or 1), but what this really means is that if the volatge is above one level it is considered high (1) and below another volatge it is considered a zero. Different types of chips have different thresholds, but in all cases there are volatges that are neither high nor low and the objective of every digital engineer is to make sure that there is enough enough power to make sure that the circuits can be driven to the high voltage, poor design or overloading can drop a volatge into the not high not low volatage area. These voltage thresholds are in reference to ground so if we are using 5 volt logic where high is anything over 3 volts and low is anything below 2 volts, 2.5 volts would be invalid and nothing works, but 3 volts on a circuit connected to one ground may only be 2.5 volts connected to a circuit using a different ground.

In good design you try and limit the use of voltages to specific areas to minimize the amount of noise being generated by one circuit interfereing with another so voltages are often seperated between boards but those two boards can not communicate at all unless they are at the same ground potential. There are multiple ways to distribute ground but it is risking to provide a ground to one board and then pass that ground to another board and another, as there is no guarentee that the ground coming into the system will be at the same level after it has passed from one board to another, so optimal design says that all boards should be connected to the same ground but this can make the wiring more difficult. To limit the extra wiring for ground a chasis ground is provided so that the RF sheild that is required by FCC regualtions and is at ground protential also serves as an electrical ground its a big surface and makes a good ground. This however makes the proper working of the circuits depenant onbeing connected to the sheilding to work well. Runing wires directly from the power supply to all the boards is another way to do it or carefull daisy chaining between boards can work if it is done carefully, they all work its a matter of preference which any engineer uses on an specific project.

So I can't fault the design, its perfectly valid. We don't have the design details of each of these monitors, so we don't know which monitors can be used one way or another. If a board was designed to daisy chain grounds between boards, connecting all the grounds could cause problems, and some people at LL have report monitor problems until they removed the ground wires. Others have reported problems without ground wires and this is just a refelection on different design styles not bad engineering.

Having multiple grounds is as bad as not having grounds because it can generate what are known as ground loops in which having two connections to ground makes the ground unstable as it tries to balance the potentail between the two sources.

So you have to understand the design to know how to modify it and taking it out of its casing is modifying it.

I understand that you were incrediably frustrated by having an monitor that appeared dead but it wasn't Benq's fault that you changed their design. By the way, you're use of connecting the same board on multiple points coould lead to the ground loop situation so I suggest that connect the boards with grounding wires at one and only one point each.
SonicWonder2000
QUOTE (pagercam @ Jun 25 2005, 12:22 AM)
I think its a bit inappropriate to call a device bad engineering when an untrained technician dismantles a product and it doesn't work in another configuration.  Benq knows that thier monitors will be used as monitors with all the sheilding in place and has no expectation that it will be used in any other way.  The sheilding provies the continuous ground and that is one way to do the engineering, and as an engineer I have no  problem with that way to provide ground.  As many of the people at LL don't have an engineering or electrical backround I'll explain a few things that may help people understand the issues involved.

There are two parts to DC power, the power line and the ground, it is the most important thing, especially in digital electronics, that there is one and only one ground so that all circuits (chips or boards) have their signals referenced to the same ground potential.  There is a joke, engineering jokes aren't funny to non-engineers, that says that digital engineers have only heard rumours of something between zero and one, i.e. volatges are either high or low (0 or 1), but what this really means is that if the volatge is above one level it is considered high (1) and below another volatge it is considered a zero.  Different types of chips have different thresholds, but in all cases there are volatges that are neither  high nor low and the objective of every digital engineer is to make sure that there is enough enough power to make sure that the circuits can be driven to the high voltage, poor design or overloading can drop a volatge into the not high not low volatage area.  These voltage thresholds are in reference to ground so if we are using 5 volt logic where high is anything over 3 volts and low is anything below 2 volts, 2.5 volts would be invalid and nothing works, but 3 volts on a circuit connected to one ground may only be 2.5 volts connected to a circuit using a different ground. 

In good design you try and limit the use of voltages to specific areas to minimize the amount of noise being generated by one circuit interfereing with another so voltages are often seperated between boards but those two boards can not communicate at all unless they are at the same ground potential.  There are multiple ways to distribute ground but it is risking to provide a ground to one board and then pass that ground to another board and another, as there is no guarentee that the ground coming into the system will be at the same level after it has passed from one board to another, so optimal design says that all boards should be connected to the same ground but this can make the wiring more difficult.  To limit the extra wiring for ground a chasis ground is provided so that the RF sheild that is required by FCC regualtions and is at ground protential also serves as an electrical ground its a big surface and makes a good ground.  This however makes the proper working of the circuits depenant onbeing connected to the sheilding to work well. Runing wires directly from the power supply to all the boards is another way to do it or carefull daisy chaining between boards can work if it is done carefully, they all work its a matter of preference which any engineer uses on an specific project.

So I can't fault the design, its perfectly valid.  We don't have the design details of each of these monitors, so we don't know which monitors can be used one way or another.   If a board was designed to daisy chain grounds between boards, connecting all the grounds could cause problems, and some people at LL have report monitor problems  until they removed the ground wires. Others have reported problems without ground wires and this is just a refelection on different design styles not bad engineering. 

Having multiple grounds is as bad as not having grounds because it can generate what are known as ground loops in which having two connections to ground makes the ground unstable as it tries to balance the potentail between the two sources.

So you have to understand the design to know how to modify it and taking it out of its casing is modifying it. 

I understand that you were incrediably frustrated by having an monitor that appeared dead but it wasn't Benq's fault that you changed their design.  By the way, you're use of connecting the same board on multiple points coould lead to the ground loop situation so I suggest that connect the boards with grounding wires at one and only one point each.
*


Pager,

First off, thank you for the insightful and thoughtful reply. I am sure that it will be useful to people in the future who have limited experience with electronics.

I thought a bit before responding to your post. I wasn't going to, but then it left me feeling a little deflated and I thought I should set the record straight. This is a forum for people to ask for help and share their experiences and opinions regarding all things building projector-related. This is exactly what I did. If you were offended by my opinion, you could have personal messaged me with your concerns, and perhaps I could have had the post deleted.

Instead, you refer to me in your post as "an untrained technician". I don't want to turn this into a "show me your credentials" thread, but I also have a degree in Electrical Engineering from Cal, Berkeley; I know whereof I speak.

In my opinion, using the chasis to carry dc common is an invitation to induce noise. The chassis acts like an antenna. There are traces on the board for the specific purpose of carrying ground. Granted, my opinion was colored by the nightmare I experienced where my BenQ worked flawlessly without grounds connected, and then a couple of hours later, refused to even power on. Indeed, many here have been thrilled with their BenQ's.

I felt, however, rather belittled after reading your post and thought I should communicate that to you publicly. If this was not your intention, then I apologize.
scubasteve2365
Funny .... Im an electrical engineer as well, Purdue University, and I agree with Sonic....

First off in most modern technology, at least schmidtt(sp) triggering is used on the digital devices. Where the transistion from a low to high occurs at one voltage level (I forget the exact levels but I believe somewhere around 1.8V) .... and on its transistion from a high to a low it occurs at .8V) ..... With further advancements in technology come better transistion periods in this digital devices, which are completly neccessary for the higher demand of high frequency operation. Only your old cheap TTL/CMOS IC's are going to recquire the funky 3V and up digital level with the unknown condition in the middle that you spoke of.

And your example of a ground loop is PERFECT ...... Now, that large metal chassis is no different than having multiple un-necessary ground wires (i.e. Sonics above pic), it provides the same looping condition in which the potential that you spoke of is difficult to balance.

Having one and only one ground path leads to there being one and only one potential path for the source to travel, and thus leads to no signal confusion. This point is simply co-related to the exact facts you stated.

Your point also seems to be invalid when the fact remains that on that particular monitor there are grounds via trace/wires between all of the boards except for the small board directly connected to the LCD. That is the one board without the ground, which doesnt make sense to either the possiblity of a ground loop or the possiblity of potential difference.

Also, refer to the basic principal of induction ..... A conductor placed within range of a magnetic field will conduct some electricity of its own. Well that really large chassis will easily begin to take in some small current, while this is usually great for Noise blocking ... what if that induction occured from maybe the built in power supply housed on the same board?? that could then change the effective common of the entire circuit and thus lowering/raising the voltage potential between the source and this common resulting in a shift in voltage at the IC and possibly an improper digital state read.

This is bad engineering ... I worked repairing LCD/CRT monitors through engineering school and I didnt see this situtation before seeing this BENQ ... its an odd design, and it doesnt make sense ......
pendulum
it's cheap, it's chinese mass manufactured.. and you've taken it apart!

good news that you got it working again!
GadgetSmith
no ee credentials, but i've been around manufacturing to know a little something, and that would be that someone, somewhere made a mistake. (design, engineering, manufacturing... who knows...) why do I say this ?... because this problem only shows on one version of the Benq monitor, no others. It would seem that whereever the mistake was made in not grounding correctly, it was resolved, and further models need not have these grounding wires.

IMHO,
gs
pagercam
QUOTE (SonicWonder2000 @ Jun 27 2005, 12:51 AM)
Instead, you refer to me in your post as "an untrained technician". I don't want to turn this into a "show me your credentials" thread, but I also have a degree in Electrical Engineering from Cal, Berkeley; I know whereof I speak.
...

I felt, however, rather belittled after reading your post and thought I should communicate that to you publicly.  If this was not your intention, then I apologize.
*

I ment no disrespect. The untrained technician was not a comment to mean that you were not knowledgable but to refer to the fact that none (maybe there are exceptions) of us are LCD repair guys who have the training in repair and maintainence of these products, I fall into that group as well. No matter how experienced we are at electronics not having all the deisgn details for a device puts us at risk of making mistakes.

If I had the money to buy a Porsche (and I don't with a wife and two kids) I wouldn't take it to a GM mechanic, the GM mechanics, may be good or even great, but they most likely don't have any expereince turning wrenches on a Porsche, its just a different beast.

Thats all I was trying to say, I appologize if in my rush to get my throughts across I worded things poorly. Your project is quite a work of art and you've done a great job, I hope mine comes out as well as yours. I was very happy that what appeared to be a disaster had a simple fix and that things turned around quickly.
SonicWonder2000
QUOTE (pagercam @ Jun 27 2005, 05:46 PM)
QUOTE (SonicWonder2000 @ Jun 27 2005, 12:51 AM)
Instead, you refer to me in your post as "an untrained technician". I don't want to turn this into a "show me your credentials" thread, but I also have a degree in Electrical Engineering from Cal, Berkeley; I know whereof I speak.
...

I felt, however, rather belittled after reading your post and thought I should communicate that to you publicly.  If this was not your intention, then I apologize.
*

I ment no disrespect. The untrained technician was not a comment to mean that you were not knowledgable but to refer to the fact that none (maybe there are exceptions) of us are LCD repair guys who have the training in repair and maintainence of these products, I fall into that group as well. No matter how experienced we are at electronics not having all the deisgn details for a device puts us at risk of making mistakes.

If I had the money to buy a Porsche (and I don't with a wife and two kids) I wouldn't take it to a GM mechanic, the GM mechanics, may be good or even great, but they most likely don't have any expereince turning wrenches on a Porsche, its just a different beast.

Thats all I was trying to say, I appologize if in my rush to get my throughts across I worded things poorly. Your project is quite a work of art and you've done a great job, I hope mine comes out as well as yours. I was very happy that what appeared to be a disaster had a simple fix and that things turned around quickly.
*



Thank you for your clarification - I feel much better about it now biggrin.gif .

Time to let this thread die a graceful death and continue on with our projector-making madness!! wacko.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.