QUOTE (stickgrip @ May 12 2005, 03:58 PM)
QUOTE (gubon13 @ May 11 2005, 03:53 PM)
Initial results look great at 50" diagonal. When I push it back to 100" diagonal, the brightness and colors just DIE.I'm starting to wonder if I should have gone with the 400W.
I figure the best you can do with that small a screen and a 250 watt bulb is about a 50 lumen PJ . With the condensor you might creep to the 70 range but it won't cut it with much more than your 40" or 50" image. You'll need some good condensor cooling if you do go with a big bulb and condensor.
I think trying to go with a shorter collimator lens could help a lot more than the bigger bulb.
Kirk
Well, right now, it's laid out as such:
250W HQI ---> Condenser ---> 220mm Fresnel ---> LCD ---> 330mm Frensel ---> Varifocal Lens.
Distance from HQI to Collimator Fresnel is 220mm.
Distance from Collimator Fresnel to LCD is 15mm.
Distance from LCD to Condenser Fresnel is 22mm.
Distance from Condenser Fresnel to Varifocal Lens is 315mm.
What hurts with this setup most (aside from lighting problems) is that at 84" from the screen (which is where I'd ultimately like for it to go), I can only get a 46-50" image. I'm thinking of replacing the Condenser Fresnel with a 200-220mm fresnel to get an image of ~65". I just don't know if this will work with the varifocal lens. At ~65" it's bright enough that I don't want to shoot anyone...just yet... I was really shooting for something in the 80-90" range.
I don't mind the idea of increasing the cooling as I will likely rebuild the enclosure as noted earlier. This would mean that I could redesign the whole thing.
I'm confused as to why I'm getting so little brightness considering the results I've seen from others here and at ALLINBOX. My guess was that the condenser was a major suspect in my setup.
How exactly would a shorter collimator fresnel help? (Forgive my ignorance.)