QUOTE (dhepburn @ Jun 11 2006, 02:15 AM)

Hi Pun15her,
An udpdate to my build...I've just gone through my second LCD. In both cases I didn't protect the FFC well enough and they tore off from the circuit board - you'd think I'd learnt my lesson after the first one. :angry:
Anyway, I'm adding this post as a question to you (admittedly a little off topic from your plog). I had planned on having my projector ready for the World Cup but since I did the LCD panel in, I've resorted to borrowing somebody's BENQ projector, its fairly high spec projector (BENQ PB6200). Watching the first match, I was comparing the projected image against my 81cm LCD TV and I have to say, the LCD TV is far superior in picture quality. The colours on the LCD TV are vivid, bright, and "alive" and just far more enjoyable to watch. This lead me to think whether a lumenlab built projector would be as good/better/worse than the quality of my TV. The only way I can ask others to compare their results is by putting the projected image against an LCD monitor. This would be similar to a LCD TV. I think comparing the BENQ to a LCD TV is a little unfair, but a lumenlab projector to a LCD monitor should be more equal.
So the questions is...How does your projector quality compare to the same image produced on a LCD monitor? How does the brightness of the colours compare? Thanks.
I'm probably not the physics expert you're looking for either. But, here are my 2 cents.
In terms of brightness, I think it is certainly possible to match an LCD monitor with a projection. However, because of all of the layers our light must travel through compared to the LCD monitor, not to mention the image magnification, this is going to take one bright bulb - certainly far far brighter than anything used as an LCD backlight. Another problem we face is the evenness of the brightness - LCD monitors don't have this issue - but it too seems like something that could be minimized to the point of 'sensory ignorance'. But as along as we use fresnel lenses and a point source, we have to deal with less light hitting the extremes of the collector lens due to the greater angle of incidence (as light hits a surface at increasing angles the original amount of light gets dispersed over a greater area, meaning less light/unit area at the extremes - actually, this is part of the reason why we have seasons).
In terms of color, I can only see a few reasons why a projected image would display worse coloring. First, a low brightness would seem to wash out anything 'brilliant'. But theoretically, the brightness issue could be resolved. Second, the surface onto which the image is being projected is going to do some absorbtion. But you can probably get around this too with the appropriate screen. Lastly, the color of the light passing through the LCD is going to play a role in washing out certain colors, but again this could theoretically be resolved with the purest of white light with the appropriate bulb. I understand the new LL bulbs are a much 'cleaner' light than anything they've sold in the past. Finally, lens' may introduce chromatic abberation (where short wavelengths of light 'bend' in different amounts to long wavelengths at the barriers of two different optical mediums).
In terms of contrast, well... Here's where I pretend to know even less than above. The projection screen would again play a big role, but you can get high gain screens, or course at a cost. Also, the quality of light passing through the LCD, also theoretically curable. There are probably some other issues, but not likely anything unresolvable.
Sharpness seems to be an matter of focus which should not be an issue with the correct lenses, though small deviances may be introduced. Hopefully, we would again be 'sensory ignorant' to any of these.
So, I think the short answer (from me, again no expert) is that a projected image could theoretically match the LCD image in terms of overall picture quality. However, the necessary equipment to do this is not likely at our disposal, so in the mean time it would seem that all of our projections may fall slightly short in comparison to the 'real' image. But I can say, that even in my converted OHP build on a 15" samsung the quality of the image at 80" was remarkably close to an LCD by my account.
If you have not seen a DIY projector in action and are worried about not having a watchable image, I'd say you have nothing to fear. My first projector was thrown together in one weekend and was no work of precision, so my projection was best when it was a little smaller than I wanted (80" - due to brightness issues). However, it was phenomenal to experience: great colors, great focus, great everything. My second will be a 17" with far superior image quality, and I've learned how to minimize many of the issues which seem to plague our brand of projection. I can't wait to complete it.
Dave