QUOTE (SupraGuy @ Oct 5 2009, 02:08 PM)

They're talking 170lumens/watt, at 250W that's 42,500 lumens, which is about 5% brighter than a 400W MH.
The bulb isn't 250w the total system draw is. The brightest bulbs are ~185w.
QUOTE
The really cool thing though is that the plasma light source is just 5mm in diameter, so this means that we don't have nearly the arc issues to deal with. This puts the lamp arc size in league with commercial projector lamps, making tuning the projector MUCH easier. This will mean higher efficiencies though the rest of the system.
Big plus.
QUOTE
My only doubt remaining is with the placement of the "puck" and if this will allow a reflector.
If it does not, then this loses the ~50% gain that we can get from the pro reflector, and makes this less desirable... However a 400W ~68,000 lumen lamp will produce more native lux with no reflector at all than the 400W MH lamp with pro reflector.
It will not be possible to add a typical reflector. The puck inside the emitter is an RF waveguide and electric field amplifier that is needed to set the halides off. It completely encases the back half of the bulb.
There is more to the lumen numbers when comparing them. Initial lumen is a 360 deg measurement. With a typical 40,000lm bulb and reflector setup you are only going to use the lumen from the front and rear of the bulb, the top and bottoms are wasted light. At best we are only able to use about half the rated lumens of a typical MH bulb anyway. With the LiFi the light output is spread from a single plain in a 45deg cone.
Case in point, there is a diy PJ out there, already using the STA-40-02 right now with a common fresnel, condenser, and 15.4 LCD that is sitting at 200 ANSI after calibration. I figure with the
right optics, at
least a 25% increase from this should be doable.