Except from an e-mail sent to Favorite Uncle:
[I realized the first week of school I need to start painting again. I came to the student union building to get a student ID and while waiting to get my picture taken I looked at the art on the wall. I could have understood if it had been the office occupant's work or one of a friend/child and she was trying to be polite, but it was a repro and this one happened to be 71 of 100. Yeah, yeah, the whole business of it being the school mascot allows for some cheesiness but the technique was garbage. I handled a pencil better in the 7th grade (art from 8th grade) and this was done by a college student! But not only that, there's at least 70 others hanging around campus! So I figure, whoop-dee-doo, they're promoting student art. It's not like *new school* is known for their art department. Seriously, the classwork hung at intervals during the term at *my alma mater* was virtually all better than this, let alone to mass produce it and frame it.
So after I get my pic taken, I start to wander, getting a feel for the new school. I stumble across an honest-to-goodness gallery. So I start walking through, and after seeing about 3 paintings (this was a one person show) I'm looking for the podium or poster with the artist's statement. There is none and that frustrates me, because I want to give this person the benefit of the doubt. I want to read that this individual has a disability of some sort. (I know that sounds inordinately cruel, but it's not meant to -- I was just desperately trying to reconcile what I was seeing with what my experiences in the art world have been.) Colors straight from the tube, gloppy, muddy shadows. Now I get very direct (as in the painting method) sometimes and I've done at least one painting that the surface was over an inch deep. The thickness of the paint is not the issue; it's how it's laid down, blended or not blended into the paint next to it. Hard to explain, but this was just messy and not as a deliberate aesthetic given the subject matter and treatment. The part that surprised me the most is that the majority of the paintings were sold, either already hailing from private collections or had just been purchased. ]
I've strolled through houses in the state worth upwards of half a million and not seen a single original piece of art (all reproductions) -- not all those houses, but most -- and so either the rules have changed since I was painting, the new city I live in likes original art more than other parts I've been in or this was a show for someone who has never taken a basic painting course and people felt like being REALLY encouraging.
Yes, I can admit it freely now. I am an art snob. *sigh* Good to get that off my chest!
Who else is feelin' "holier than thou" about something?
edit:wrong junior high year
