QUOTE (computercowboy @ May 25 2007, 05:27 AM)

DJ,
I am thinking of building an LED PJ and I have no need for keystone correction, all the LED PJs i have seen have the fresnel between the triplet and the LCD (like in a split optics setup) I am thinking of puttin the frezzie behind the LCD like in an un-split setup.
from back to front it would go LED board, fl550 fresnel, LCD, Pro lens
Do you think that putting the fresnel between the LED board and the LCD would help shape the light better, and perhaps be more efficient?
The only reason to change the fresnel’s position besides keystone correction or light evenness would be to better match the triplet’s focal length. The position of the LCD is not really important.
QUOTE (redbullah @ May 28 2007, 07:05 AM)

@dj
what do you call right angle is between 25° and 40° right? That's why you fail, if you use high power luminox or smd leds. They have 90° range.
Edit:
And yes 90° is a right angle just not the right angle I’m talking about.
About 6° is ideal, anything greater than this angle will be wasted. 6° out of your proposed 90° beam angle is not very good efficiency.
A very common assumption is, that if the LCD is illuminated with light that is all that matters, it’s actually not the case at all. The fresnel needs to have incident rays of a particular angle for any hope of them passing though the triplet.
Just so you can understand the concept, remove the fresnel completely for this example. Now using your 90° LEDs behind the LCD and a triplet placed at it’s focused position in front, not a great deal of light from each of the 90° beams is going to pass though the triplet. When a fresnel is added the same problem will exist except that now the 90°beams will be refracted slightly. Replace the 90° LEDs with something smaller and a much larger percentage of the beams are going to pass through the triplet.
DJ