QUOTE (gdog05 @ Nov 17 2007, 05:15 AM)

As far as the HD-DVD, they are having to bribe movie houses for temporary exclusives
HD-DVD is not the only one doing some bribing. Sony has been caught as well. It's slimey, yeah, but apparently the way it works.
as a recordable media they have less capacity, they are inferior... its pretty obvious. I say if youre already invested in a 360, why not pay extra for the drive, but if you were starting from scratch, the PS3 would be a better value, or just wait till the regular players for either format come down in price.
BetaMax had higher resolution, market penetration and brand recognition, but still lost. Mostly because Sony has very little flexibility

when they do something. Just because a media has less capacity, why does it necessarily become inferior? If Blu-Ray has double the capacity of HD-DVD, and costs three times as much, it will not be as popular, and will be inferior to the market. And as far as storage goes, the HD-VMD would probably offer the best bang for the buck, with 20-50Gb of storage, and will probably be use able with current burners with a firmware upgrade. Should also work in current DVD players.
There are a lot of factors in this game, to be calling something "inferior." Don't let Sony sell you on a marketing catchphrase so early.
Beta lost because Sony wouldnt let porn be released on its format. I doubt they will make the same mistake again.... even if they did, who would want to see most of those people in HD anyways? yuck! As far as the media capacity, I was talking about bluray vs hddvd... and as far as capacity, you cannot argue that one, why would you want the option with less capacity unless youre factoring in the video game/fanboy aspect?? And this thread isnt about that particular aspect... im trying to stick to the topic. So I dont see why its hard to comprehend that one format is better than the other, regardless of devotion to a certain company. Personally I dont care who makes what, they are both made by coalitions of many large CE companies, so its not really Sony vs. MS... they are just the big players. Besides, as a movie format, the whole HDMI thing still needs to be resolved, there are other technologies out there with the bandwidth capable of 7.1 audio, and more, but audio and video on the same cable is just asking for problems, as with the lip sync problem, but now theyre having to add yet another feature to Recievers to make up for the simple fact that the audio has a shorter run than the video.... its just a crappy standardization, trying to make better video and audio more end user friendly... make it even easier than composite... too bad most still cant figure that out. And HDCP is a whole other ridiculous situation.
its funny I was just talking value, which was kind of what this thread was about, is the add on drive for the 360 worth it, I said that if you already have a 360, its obviously worth it, but I was saying you also have to factor in the price of the 360 which brings it up to where the PS3 and some of the standalone high def players... so buying the whole MS package from scratch may not be a good idea base on the fact that it is likely to cook itself.