QUOTE (dracul2006 @ Dec 16 2006, 10:46 AM)

ok. yes ive done the calculations and i get the right size image i want.
Can someone explain to me why exclusive online has this configuration setup with a 240fl condensor lens and 160mm back fresnel?
Reflector + 1mm to HQI + 23.85mm to condensor + 136.15mm to fresnel + 285 to 330mm to objective.
If the condenser is a 240mm FL then should this not match the back Fresnel FL?
For smaller panels and a smaller box then it is good to use a shorter FL rear Fresnel.
The real limit to how short the rear FL can be is the arc size at the triplet. This is determined by the front to back fl or ratio.
Arc image at triplet = arc size x front to back ratio
For a 20mm arc lamp and a 220mm/220mm Fresnel setup the arc will be about 20mm at the triplet.
For a 20mm arc and a 110mm rear Fresnel and a 220mm front fresnel, the arc image will be 40mm at the triplet. (Front to back fl = 2 to 1 the arc will be twice as large at the triplet.
It is best to work backwards from the triplet to find either the largest arc that will fit or the shortest rear fl that can be used.
You could call there triplet a 300mm x 50mm triplet so the largest arc image that will fit inside the triplet is 50mm. If we call the front FL 300mm and you have a 25mm arc lamp then the shortest fl the rear Fresnel/ condenser system can have is 150mm.
When you add a 240mm fl condenser lens to a 160mm rear Fresnel the total fl will become shorter to some thing like 110mm effective fl. At this point using a shorter fl condenser will not make any more LUX, all the light will just miss the triplet because of the arc image becoming too large.
A 220mm rear fresnel and a shorter fl condenser will give better vignetting but be only slightly brighter than the 160mm fresnel and the 240mm condenser.
You triplet should be from an opaque pj and should be about 4" in diameter so a vary short rear fl will work well and make a vary bright PJ.
I would try to get that 160mm rear fresnel if you want a small box.