QUOTE (a.beam.reach @ Nov 11 2006, 07:02 PM)

Do I understand you correctly that this is not a half ass solution?
Unfortunately, it is complicated -hence the enormous anti glare thread

. It isn't guaranteed. Odds are you will have nothing but a
gain in quality -but those are just the odds:
There is a possibility that your original polarizer contained a layer of Birefringent material that worked to correct a phase shift in your LCD's Birefringent Liquid Quartz. In which case I have hypothesized you may see a loss of contrast in your monitor. Those that have done the replacement have not had this problem so far, so they either have panels with no Birefringent compensation, or
only their rear polarizer had it added. It is documented that some panels have compensation built into their front polarizers. If your panel is one of those, and my hypothesis is correct, you will loose contrast. Odds are, based on others experiments, that your panel has just a plain old polarizer and any fully linear (zero Birefringence) polarizer will do the trick. The polarization.com polarizer is one of these.
The Super-High contrast polarizer is likely of a higher quality than the one you removed. It likely has both a higher transmittance and contrast. It is reserved by manufacturers to give an edge to their high end monitors. There are also some heat advantages to removal as mentioned later.
However, there is a disadvantage to using a replacement polarizer. It will not be adhered to your panel. This will introduce around a 5% loss in transmittance as light must now pass over 2 more air to plastic interfaces. This transmittance drop will translate into around a 5% loss of brightness. If your panel is not high end, it is possible that the improved quality of the polarizer will make up for this.
Of note: People have not
noticed any change in brightness who have made the replacement. At least as I recall.
The big advantage is of course that this replacement has no anti-glare. That is huge. And when removing the anti-glare you are left with a delicate exposed PVA layer. The replacement polarizer has this protected nicely.
QUOTE
Sounds like I will have enough left over for another 15" panel if anyone is interested.
If you do decide to get the replacement polarizer you must bear in mind the orientation of the original polarizer. That is, the polarizer has an axis of orientation. It will only work if placed on your panel with the same orientation as the original. So be sure the size of polarizer you purchase can rotate to any orientation on your panel and still fit (like at 45 degrees). Chances are, you will use the whole sheet for just one panel due to an awkward axis.
QUOTE (a.beam.reach @ Nov 11 2006, 07:11 PM)

Sounds like the collimator lens needs to be pushed back. . .. How far?
Correct. By removing the anti-glare you are losing the diffusion that cuts down on Fresnel details (Grooves) being projected. This occurs any time you remove the anti-glare, not just with polarizer replacement. People add around 5mm with success as I recall.
QUOTE
Do I place the new polarizer against the LCD or back it off a bit?
As long as there is nothing between the panel and the polarizer you can place it wherever you want. I would suggest you place it up against the Fresnel (if it is not too hot). That way your panel will have cool air passing directly over the glass and will not pick up heat off the polarizer. That is a nice advantage to removal as the polarizer insulates the panel normally and the polarizer itself converts 50% of the light that enters to heat.
QUOTE
Any pictures available of a successful lens configuration.
I don't remember seeing any.
Mark