QUOTE (JoeS. @ Sep 28 2006, 08:08 PM)

...another thing that I wanted to point out about the gain and the cone, and tell me if you argree or or not, but after examining the specsheets of all the swatches, it would seem the higher the gain, the smaller the cone no matter what material...
You are correct. A screen can’t create additional light; it can only reflect what’s there. High Gain Screens reflect/focuses light back on a narrow axis (viewing cone), and thus appears brighter along this axis.
I think this is right (correct me if I'm wrong)
Gain is a measurement based on the reflectivity of a surface compared to magnesium carbonate, which has a gain of 1.0. A Screen gain of 2.8 would be 280% brighter that a 1.0 screen

. Which is why there is so much of a WOW factor with the High Power Da-Lite.
QUOTE (knightrider @ Sep 28 2006, 11:01 PM)

I can do another comparison. As you know though, I belong to the OHP tribe so, the test would not be a good indication of the viewing with a DIY PJ, but it would give someone another perspective on screen choices from Da-lite as Joe's plogs have done. I don't own a digital camera (I know, "YIKES", OH MY GOD". I am old school like Paul Sr. OCC) so, I couldn't take requests and post them with the speed of Hermes like Joe has. My old manual 35mm SLR is like deer guts on your finger, no matter how much you flick, it doesn't want to leave...
LMAO at the finger...
If you have the time and could do it, I think it would be a good contribution to everyone here as your other tests were done so professionally. There are also allot of OHP people out there, as this is how many start out. I'm currently still in the OHP tribe myself but hope to be making to move to a regular PJ soon.