QUOTE (benjimatt @ Feb 22 2006, 01:55 PM)

i was just wondering why did u want to use the 330/550 setup rather than the 220/550 setup. it seems that the 220/550 would be better
This would be true in a standard setup meaning no condenser and a 15 in monitor, With a 17 in monitor and a condenser a 220 would never be able to illuminate the panel. Here is part of a post from the precondenser thread that is linked above that explains it very well. It is possible to illuminate a 15 inch panel with the right combo of precondenser and 220 frensel. This is from post 40 in that topic.
Since both the fresnel and precondenser are actually both condenser lenses, they have a combined focal length determined by this formula:
Combined FL = (f1 x f2) / (f1 + f2 - d)
where d = distance between lenses.
Using the information above for Sim's precondenser set up, we have the following theoretical combined FL:
Sim's combined FL = (317 x 165) / (317 + 165 - 222) = 201mm
So this is less than the FL of the standard 220mm fresnel, but not by a huge amount, hence his moderately better brightness results. A shorter FL means that the lens or lens combination can capture more light.
Therefore a combined FL that was even lower, perhaps 180mm or so, would produce even more dramatic improvements in overall brightness.
To obtain this lower combined FL, Sim would need to use a precondenser with a shorter FL than 165mm. Anchor Optical has a PCX that is 113mm x 141mm FL, so that would qualify. Let's plug it into the formula:
New combined FL = (317 x 141) / (317 + 141 - 222) = 189mm
So we've made some progress and would theoretically capture more light in an ideal world. A shorter FL precondenser would be even better if it could be found and made to work.
Now let's use a standard 220mm fresnel instead of a 317mm. Using Sim's Surplus Shed precondenser, the combined FL is now:
New combined FL = (220 x 165) / (220 + 165 - 154) = 157mm
So we have made a huge gain. Note that the distance between lenses is now 154mm due to the shorter FL fresnel. And this is one of the combinations I have tried myself. But I wasn't able to fully illuminate my 15" LCD. The bulb was moved so close to the lens that I believe light began reflecting off the back side of the glass out at the fringes instead of passing on through. So it was pushing the physical limits too far. I also may have had better luck with a larger diameter reflector (than the IKEA) - but that is also just a guess.
If you are interested in how this works just click thw link I posted in the post above, it is interesting.